|
|
 |
|
SPECIAL FEATURE |
|
Year : 2019 | Volume
: 8
| Issue : 3 | Page : 162-163 |
|
Transcranial Doppler ultrasound for the brain
Hemanth Natham, Mukkara Madhusudan, Hemalatha Pasupuleti, Aloka Samantaray
Departments of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
Date of Web Publication | 4-Dec-2019 |
Correspondence Address: Aloka Samantaray Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
DOI: 10.4103/JCSR.JCSR_70_19
How to cite this article: Natham H, Madhusudan M, Pasupuleti H, Samantaray A. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound for the brain. J Clin Sci Res 2019;8:162-3 |
Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is a non-invasive method of measuring cerebral blood flow velocity (CBF-V) and its derived parameters. Its use was first described by Aaslid et al. in 1982.[1] Although initially employed for detecting vasospasm following sub-arachnoid haemorrhage, the device's scope has been expanded and it is now a proven, cost-effective and a credible tool in evaluating cerebral arterial patency, in detecting arterial stenosis and in sensing the collateral blood flow patterns in the cerebral circulation.
The device works on the Doppler effect. It relies on pulsed-wave Doppler to image vessels at various depths.[2] Acoustic windows are the parts of the skull which transmit sound waves to basal arteries. There are four acoustic windows: transtemporal, sub-occipital, transorbital and sub/retro-mandibular. Middle cerebral artery is the most common artery to be insonated as it is easily accessible through the temporal window. Further, as middle cerebral artery is said to take care of up to 50%–60% of ipsilateral carotid artery blood flow, it is taken that it represents the blood flow to ipsilateral hemisphere. To access the middle cerebral artery, the ultrasound probe has to be placed in front of tragus just above zygomatic arch. Commonly employed windows and vessels insonated through them are mentioned in [Table 1].[3] | Table 1: Commonly used acoustic windows, vessels insonated through them, depth, direction of flow and mean velocities
Click here to view |
Dynamic monitoring of CBF-V and vessel pulsatility over extended time period is a major application of TCD in clinical practice. Systolic, diastolic and mean flow velocities (MFV) will be derived from the obtained waveform. Decreased MFV is observed in hypotension and in conditions where there is an increase in intracranial pressure or a decrease in CBF. MFV is increased by either vasospasm or by an increase in blood flow, which can be differentiated by a derived index, Lindegaard ratio.[4] Gosling's pulsatility index is a derived index which is reduced with proximal obstruction and is increased with distal obstruction.
Applications of transcranial Doppler
TCD being non-invasive is touted as an alternative to four-vessel angiography for monitoring vasospasm, stenosis, stroke and cerebral circulatory arrest. TCD identifies middle cerebral artery and basilar artery vasospasm with high degree of sensitivity and specificity. It is also highly predictive in the detection of proximal anterior circulation. It is 100% specific and 96% sensitive in diagnosing brain death.[5]
Limitations
TCD uses CBF-V as a surrogate measure of CBF, and CBF-V is proportional to CBF only when vessel cross-sectional area remains constant. There may be absence of adequate acoustic window in about 8% of patients.[6] Operator experience is required for accurate assessment as improper vessel identification, and aberrant vessel course can confound even experienced sonographers in diagnosing vasospasm.
There are several advantages of using transcranial imaging. It is quick, with no radiation exposure, and unlike for magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic scan, it does not require any patient transport. Once the learning curve has been passed, it is easy to use.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References | |  |
1. | Aaslid R, Markwalder TM, Nornes H. Noninvasive transcranial Doppler ultrasound recording of flow velocity in basal cerebral arteries. J Neurosurg 1982;57:769-74. |
2. | Nicoletto HA, Burkman MH. Transcranial Doppler series part II: Performing a transcranial Doppler. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol 2009;49:14-27. |
3. | Marda MK, Prabhakar H. Transcranial Doppler. J Neuroanaesthe Crit Care 2015;2:215-20. |
4. | Lindegaard KF, Nornes H, Bakke SJ, Sorteberg W, Nakstad P. Cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid haemorrhage investigated by means of transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1988;42:81-4. |
5. | Nicoletto HA, Burkman MH. Transcranial Doppler series part III: Interpretation. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol 2009;49:244-59. |
6. | Itoh T, Matsumoto M, Handa N, Maeda H, Hougaku H, Hashimoto H, et al. Rate of successful recording of blood flow signals in the middle cerebral artery using transcranial Doppler sonography. Stroke 1993;24:1192-5. |
[Table 1]
|